[170108] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Survey on Internet Disputes.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Mar 24 10:02:44 2014
To: Kshitiz Verma <cse332instructor@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:31:56 +0530."
<CABjMnTQd6aY4Dy+V_X6O=u3zHnrwehaKDL7ej6x-ZbPqB+zSNA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:00:09 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1395669609_1994P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:31:56 +0530, Kshitiz Verma said:
> At the same time, we couldn't even find genuine disputes apart from the
> ones we shared. It seems there should be more but we just could not find
> them on the web.
Much more common than actual depeering is the passive-agressive version,
where you continue to peer but bring a smaller hose to the peering point
than the peering partner does. We see a *lot* of reports of the resulting
congestion and packet misbehavior on this list...
--==_Exmh_1395669609_1994P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=TQ8j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1395669609_1994P--
