[170101] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Survey on Internet Disputes.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kshitiz Verma)
Mon Mar 24 08:39:42 2014
In-Reply-To: <532FF9A6.7020006@init7.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:31:56 +0530
From: Kshitiz Verma <cse332instructor@gmail.com>
To: Fredy Kuenzler <kuenzler@init7.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Thanks for the clarification on the number. I was surprised to see that
number too!
At the same time, we couldn't even find genuine disputes apart from the
ones we shared. It seems there should be more but we just could not find
them on the web.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Fredy Kuenzler <kuenzler@init7.net> wrote:
> Am 23.03.2014 05:40, schrieb Kshitiz Verma:
> > As claimed in http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~misra/news/CD070113.pdf ,
> > 500 to 1000 de-peering happens on a daily basis today.
>
> I suppose this is just by technical incapabilities. People leak
> prefixes, hit max-pref limters, forget to clear sessions or don't bother
> increasing limits, they migrate gear from Cisco to Brocade or Juniper
> and cannot recover encrypted MD5 passwords... or management decisions
> decide to pull from an exchange.
>
> I don't consider this "de-peering" a peering dispute or an offensive
> act. The majority of vanished BGP adjacencies are due to laziness or
> technical limitations.
>
> --
> Fredy Kuenzler
>
> Init7 (Switzerland) Ltd.
> AS13030
> St. Georgen-Strasse 70
> CH-8400 Winterthur
> Skype: flyingpotato
> Phone: +41 44 315 4400
> Fax: +41 44 315 4401
> Twitter: @init7 / @kuenzler
> http://www.init7.net/
>
>
