[170079] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: arin representation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Naslund, Steve)
Mon Mar 24 00:20:21 2014
From: "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund@medline.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 04:17:07 +0000
In-Reply-To: <m27g7k44q8.wl%randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
No problem. One of the risks in text communication. =20
I guess the usefulness of the measurement would be in what the original que=
stion is?
If we knew more about what the membership / non-membership question was abo=
ut it would be easier. I guess if we were really trying to figure out how =
much address space is within ARIN member "control", just the holder would b=
e enough to know. For example, you could say the X% of space is being used=
by ARIN members and X% is in use by legacy users. Since the holder could =
change or revoke access to the space by an end user I guess we could say th=
ey control it. =20
For other questions it might be more important to know who is "using" an ad=
dress space. Like how much space is issued to end users directly by ARIN v=
s provided to them by service providers. The two types would have very dif=
ferent rules regarding reallocation and such.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]=20
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 11:10 PM
To: Naslund, Steve
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: arin representation
sorry steve.
was not chasing down the tree. not clear what a useful measurement would b=
e.
randy
