[170078] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: arin representation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Curran)
Mon Mar 24 00:16:49 2014
From: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
To: "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund@medline.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 04:16:24 +0000
In-Reply-To: <9578293AE169674F9A048B2BC9A081B4B5421B56@MUNPRDMBXA1.medline.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Steve -
Thanks for the reminder; terminology aside, I think we have=20
a good understanding of Randy's request for statistics.
We'll put these together asap.
/John
> On Mar 24, 2014, at 11:58 AM, "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund@medline.com> wro=
te:
>=20
> Sorry Randy,
>=20
> I was not trying to criticize your terminology. I was just wondering abo=
ut the question trying to be answered here. The holder of an address space=
and the end user of the address space are two really different things. Th=
e holder is often an ARIN member or grandfathered in and an end user (inclu=
ding most ISP customers) are not going to be ARIN members. I know that you=
and most of the other on here know that they are not "owners" of the space=
. I was just trying to figure out if your term "owner" refers to the holde=
r of the space or the user of the space. Not trying to make a political st=
atement.
>=20
> I apologize if I gave you the impression that I disapproved of your quest=
ion.
>=20
> Steve
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]=20
> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 10:52 PM
> To: Naslund, Steve
> Cc: John Curran; North American Network Operators' Group
> Subject: Re: arin representation
>=20
>> I think the term "owned" is a problem here.
>=20
> sorry not to get your religious icons correctly. full refund below.
>=20
> jeezus! get a life.
>=20
> randy
