[170050] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: misunderstanding scale
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Timothy Morizot)
Sun Mar 23 19:49:55 2014
In-Reply-To: <532F6C8E.9040705@mykolab.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:49:36 -0500
From: Timothy Morizot <tmorizot@gmail.com>
To: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@mykolab.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mar 23, 2014 6:21 PM, "Paul Ferguson" <fergdawgster@mykolab.com> wrote:
> Says you.
And many others. My comments were actually reiterating what I commonly see
presented today.
> On the other hand, there are beaucoup enterprise networks unwilling to
> consider to moving to v6 until there are management, control,
> administrative, and security issues addressed.
Whereas there are other enterprise networks, including mine, who are
actively deploying IPv6 and have been for a number of years now. So unless
you can come up with something truly novel that we haven't already dealt
with, I'll stick by my use of FUD.
> You can continue to deride our issues, and make derisive comments
> until your heart's content, but it does not change reality.
I wasn't aware that calling out FUD was derisive, but whatever.
Cheers,
Scott
