[169999] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: misunderstanding scale
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Sat Mar 22 18:50:19 2014
X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 22:49:40 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org>,
nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1403221522230.13760@whammy.cluebyfour.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 22/03/2014 19:35, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
> CGN also comes with lots of downside that customers are likely to find
> unpleasant. For some operators, customer (dis)satisfaction might be the
> driver that ultimately forces them to deploy IPv6.
don't believe for a moment that v6 to v4 protocol translation is any less
ugly than CGN.
Nick
