[169920] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Level 3 blames Internet slowdowns on ISPs' refusal to upgrade
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Thu Mar 20 18:04:51 2014
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:04:25 -0700
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@mykolab.com>
To: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF50B1B5.17A5C%wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Are carriers prepared to tunnel IPv4 traffic?
Carriers offering v6 is a novel idea, but the edge networks,
enterprises, etc. are moving very fast.
- - ferg
On 3/20/2014 2:58 PM, Warren Bailey wrote:
> Meh.. Some providers need to/should comply with the majority of
> the requirements. Iıd support ipv6 if I could and it wasnıt a big
> deal, but my traffic originates from (usually) the ipv4 sphere. So
> unless all of these carriers start magically migrating to v6, I
> donıt know that a lot of ³hosting² providers need to support it.
> Itıs a cool feature, but itıs not something where I head for the
> door when they say I canıt receive v6 traffic.
>
> My .02.
>
> On 3/20/14, 2:52 PM, "Jim Popovitch" <jimpop@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Warren Bailey
>> <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote:
>>> This email is the reason I spend money with digital ocean. :)
>>>
>>> You should too.
>>
>> uhh, no. It's the 21st century. I prefer to spend my money with
>> those that, at a bare minimum, provide IPv6.
>>
>> -Jim P.
>
>
>
>
- --
Paul Ferguson
VP Threat Intelligence, IID
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iF4EAREIAAYFAlMrZekACgkQKJasdVTchbIXxwD+NLe6LUPJCbpKXGfevbPzAGWy
BJu93FYH2Lfl9lMjTToA/2uGkqbI/ibO1eHH412gw4A6yLT7LLUoVK8yXwJiGRm1
=mbB3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
