[169919] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Level 3 blames Internet slowdowns on ISPs' refusal to upgrade
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Warren Bailey)
Thu Mar 20 18:00:37 2014
From: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
To: Jim Popovitch <jimpop@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 21:58:55 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAGfsgR3BsgjjBoWOmMJn_W-sJo3D=Td7G97LgpT6kF+XhtgguQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Meh.. Some providers need to/should comply with the majority of the
requirements. I=B9d support ipv6 if I could and it wasn=B9t a big deal, but=
my
traffic originates from (usually) the ipv4 sphere. So unless all of these
carriers start magically migrating to v6, I don=B9t know that a lot of
=B3hosting=B2 providers need to support it. It=B9s a cool feature, but it=
=B9s not
something where I head for the door when they say I can=B9t receive v6
traffic.
My .02.
On 3/20/14, 2:52 PM, "Jim Popovitch" <jimpop@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Warren Bailey
><wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote:
>> This email is the reason I spend money with digital ocean. :)
>>
>> You should too.
>
>uhh, no. It's the 21st century. I prefer to spend my money with those
>that, at a bare minimum, provide IPv6.
>
>-Jim P.
