|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net> To: sixsigma44@hotmail.com (Ray) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 18:48:33 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <BLU179-W818D2DBB2C6E4ACFD5FE73DC8E0@phx.gbl> Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org > Depending on their business=2C using dynamic DNS providers could be a reall= > y bad idea. If they deal only with home users who won't even know=2C it'll = > probably work. If their customers are security-aware businesses=2C they pro= > bably block all sites hosted with dynamic DNS systems. Where do dynamic DNS /providers/ enter the picture? You update *your own* DNS records. Those could conceivably be hosted with a dynamic DNS provider, but why not just use the API for whatever system you currently use for DNS? ... JG -- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN) With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |