[169560] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arturo Servin)
Mon Mar 3 23:31:33 2014
In-Reply-To: <1473335835.293638.1393903242317.JavaMail.zimbra@network1.net>
From: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 20:30:53 -0800
To: Randy Carpenter <rcarpen@network1.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Randy Carpenter <rcarpen@network1.net>wrote:
> Is there some technical reason that BGP is not an option? You could allow
> them to announce their AT&T space via you as a secondary.
unless it is a /26, /25 or something shorter.
Even with a /24 things may get messy.
IPv4 is coming to an end, but it is not possible for the customer to get
their own space and use BGP?
Regards,
as
