[169477] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon FIOS IPv6?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen Frost)
Thu Feb 27 21:18:48 2014
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 21:18:08 -0500
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: David Hubbard <dhubbard@dino.hostasaurus.com>
In-Reply-To: <FCD26398C5EDE746BFC47F43EA52A17305A15EBC@dino.ad.hostasaurus.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--e8sU/AaRH4wTizzs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I echo the 'good luck' and ditto on the experience.
There's a lot of people anxious to get IPv6 on FIOS, but there seems to
be precious little movement over there.
* David Hubbard (dhubbard@dino.hostasaurus.com) wrote:
> Good luck. We've been bitching at our sales rep for years, as we've adde=
d circuits, and haven't gotten even empty promises; just the same endless V=
erizon BS about "it's being tested in select markets" although no one has e=
ver been able to prove that to be the case. You definitely get static IP's=
on business connections; that's just a matter of how much you pay and how =
many you need.
>=20
> David
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tristan Lear [mailto:trissypissy@gmail.com]=20
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 1:45 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Verizon FIOS IPv6?
>=20
> My strategy, should I remember it tomorrow:
>=20
> We have a business-class FIOS=A0connection where I work and a static IP=
=A0as well. At least three people who work here have FIOS=A0at home. I've r=
ead rumors about business class customers who really work their phone sex g=
etting native ipv6, and I also heard somethin about static ip's. So I'll tr=
y that, and also mention that "we're transitioning our employees who remote=
in from home to FIOS but we'd like ipv6=A0for ...=A0VPN purposes, NAT trav=
ersal, etc ..." I mean, that should get them a little wet right?
>=20
> I have a bit of a hairbrained theory that the reason ISP's=A0have stagnat=
ed on ipv6 has to do with relationship between capitalism and scarcity. Hav=
ing a limited quantity of anything makes it more valuable. Why wouldn't tha=
t apply to IP's?
>=20
>=20
--e8sU/AaRH4wTizzs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=C5Ni
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--e8sU/AaRH4wTizzs--
