[169474] in North American Network Operators' Group
Verizon FIOS IPv6?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tristan Lear)
Thu Feb 27 21:08:44 2014
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 01:44:50 -0500
From: "Tristan Lear" <trissypissy@gmail.com>
To: "" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
My strategy, should I remember it tomorrow:
We have a business-class FIOS=C2=A0connection where I work and a static IP=
=C2=A0as well. At least three people who work here have FIOS=C2=A0at home. =
I've read rumors about business class customers who really work their phone=
sex getting native ipv6, and I also heard somethin about static ip's. So I=
'll try that, and also mention that "we're transitioning our employees who =
remote in from home to FIOS but we'd like ipv6=C2=A0for ...=C2=A0VPN purpos=
es, NAT traversal, etc ..." I mean, that should get them a little wet right?
I have a bit of a hairbrained theory that the reason ISP's=C2=A0have stagna=
ted on ipv6 has to do with relationship between capitalism and scarcity. Ha=
ving a limited quantity of anything makes it more valuable. Why wouldn't th=
at apply to IP's?
