[168863] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Wed Feb 5 23:35:20 2014
In-Reply-To: <201402060632.26462.mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 23:34:16 -0500
To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu,Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>,nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Sure. Part of the data collection task. Making sure all the current new gear knows how, still a good idea.
On February 5, 2014 11:32:26 PM EST, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> wrote:
>On Wednesday, February 05, 2014 11:24:42 PM Jay Ashworth
>wrote:
>
>> As I've noted, I'm not sure I believe that's true of
>> current generation gear, and if it *is*, then it should
>> cost manufacturers business.
>
>But only matters if you're refreshing or just starting out.
>
>A lot of operators have a large installed base of such kit,
>and given horsepower is still plenty, getting that swapped
>out is a tall ask.
>
>Mark.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
