[168862] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Wed Feb 5 23:32:58 2014
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 06:32:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: <5822441.7294.1391635482579.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com>
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--nextPart2155541.tIPhfzlESl
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wednesday, February 05, 2014 11:24:42 PM Jay Ashworth=20
wrote:
> As I've noted, I'm not sure I believe that's true of
> current generation gear, and if it *is*, then it should
> cost manufacturers business.
But only matters if you're refreshing or just starting out.
A lot of operators have a large installed base of such kit,=20
and given horsepower is still plenty, getting that swapped=20
out is a tall ask.
Mark.
--nextPart2155541.tIPhfzlESl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=ab6n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart2155541.tIPhfzlESl--
