[168604] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alain Hebert)
Fri Jan 31 11:32:30 2014
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:32:17 -0500
From: Alain Hebert <ahebert@pubnix.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <52EBBAFE.7040509@foobar.org>
Reply-To: ahebert@pubnix.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 01/31/14 10:02, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 31/01/2014 13:58, Alain Hebert wrote:
>> IRRToolset 5.0.1 (rtconfig really) finally gave out on a pretty
>> messy RPSL parse.
> of direct relevance to this:
>
> https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/irrtoolset/2011-April/000736.html
>
> tl;dr: rpsl itself is a mess => no point in fixing irrtoolset
>
> There is some work in progress to try to create a new policy description
> language which would be a replacement for rpsl. Very early stages so far,
> though.
>
> Nick
Well,
Thanks to all.
Job:
bgpq3 works great the as-set that was borking rtlookup generate a
~183k long prefix list =D.
ML:
as for auto-deploying / auto-push to routers... I still prefer to
do that manually myself.
Nick:
Yes, I saw those tidbits while looking for a replacement.
If you're talking about RPSLng, it does not seems to gain any traction.
From what I could see...
-----
Alain Hebert ahebert@pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443
