[168602] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Fri Jan 31 10:02:44 2014
X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:02:22 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: ahebert@pubnix.net, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <52EBABEE.800@pubnix.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 31/01/2014 13:58, Alain Hebert wrote:
> IRRToolset 5.0.1 (rtconfig really) finally gave out on a pretty
> messy RPSL parse.
of direct relevance to this:
https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/irrtoolset/2011-April/000736.html
tl;dr: rpsl itself is a mess => no point in fixing irrtoolset
There is some work in progress to try to create a new policy description
language which would be a replacement for rpsl. Very early stages so far,
though.
Nick
