[168572] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Updated ARIN allocation information
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Phil Rosenthal)
Thu Jan 30 10:56:11 2014
From: Phil Rosenthal <pr@isprime.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLabq=CSJSv4hufv+LSJ4d2JBhLQPukDcX3gxtc6-1PZA=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:55:55 -0500
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jan 29, 2014, at 10:22 PM, Christopher Morrow =
<morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> maybe these weren't meant to be used outside the local ASN? :)
> I do wonder though what the purpose of this block is? If it's to be
> used inside the local ASN (as seems to be indicated based upon minimum
> allocation sizes) then why not use the IETF marked 100.64/10 space
> instead? Global-uniqueness? ok, sure...
Seems like the obvious use case is for 6to4 NAT gateways, which would =
mean that global reachability would be expected.
-Phil=
