[168571] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: FW: Updated ARIN allocation information
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin M. Streiner)
Thu Jan 30 10:49:24 2014
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 07:28:47 -0500 (EST)
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org>
To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <52EA67FD.7080805@fud.no>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Tore Anderson wrote:
> I wouldn't worry if I were you. I'll wager you $100 that pretty much all
> of the people requesting a block from ARIN under this policy (or any
> other) is going to go for a /24 (or larger). There is some precedent;
> RIPE policy has not mandated a minimum assignment size for IPv4 PI, at
> least not in the last decade, yet the NCC has made almost no assignments
> smaller than /24.
Depends on the burn rate on that /10...
jms
