[168324] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Sun Jan 19 13:59:29 2014
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 20:58:24 +0200
In-Reply-To: <52DC10E6.1000400@bogus.com>
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--nextPart1632388.YyUXPd6ZdF
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sunday, January 19, 2014 07:52:38 PM joel jaeggli wrote:
> It doesn't make a lot of sense to have device that has a
> nominal capacity of several Tb/s attempt to punt packets
> up to a control-plane processor that's gig-e connected.
Not that the control plane would forward said traffic at=20
Gig-E speeds anyway.
Mark.
--nextPart1632388.YyUXPd6ZdF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=J8wn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1632388.YyUXPd6ZdF--
