[168298] in North American Network Operators' Group
Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mukom Akong T.)
Fri Jan 17 23:11:06 2014
From: "Mukom Akong T." <mukom.tamon@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:09:58 +0400
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hello folks,
Does anyone have any experiences or insights to share on how more (or
less) efficient routing is with IPv6? Any specific thoughts with respect to
how the following characteristics help or not with routing efficiency?
- fixed header size
- Extension header chain
- flow labels in header
- no intermediate fragmentation
- no checksums
Thanks in advance.
--=20
Mukom Akong T.
http://about.me/perfexcellence | twitter: @perfexcellent
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---------------------------------------------------------------
=E2=80=9CWhen you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whisperin=
g of the
hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----------------------------------------------------------------
