[168311] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Frank Habicht)
Sun Jan 19 02:19:48 2014
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 10:19:21 +0300
From: Frank Habicht <geier@geier.ne.tz>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHDzDLAvCUu1+MJLWpF8M66OnZHkudZ1HXVk5cZOT09Zm3Jdnw@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 1/19/2014 7:00 AM, Mukom Akong T. wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
>> extension headers are a poor idea because it's troublesome to process them
>> on cheap hardware.
>
> Have you found them to be more troublesome to process than IPv4 options
> are/were?
at what position in the packet is the tcp port?
a) in v4
b) in v6
c) v6 with a few extension headers
now program a chip to filter based on this port number...
Frank
