[168122] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Experiences with Spamhaus BGP DROP, EDROP and BGPCC BGP feeds
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (TR Shaw)
Thu Jan 9 17:36:59 2014
From: TR Shaw <tshaw@oitc.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJj1h3EZvCk2NyEqfcvKScuOKJk-hEmGhCMZtimp+k8-OidW6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 17:36:46 -0500
To: Richard Hesse <richard.hesse@weebly.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Richard I would be more than happy to get you intouch with someone who =
can help you
Technically they are very good.
Tom
On Jan 9, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Richard Hesse wrote:
> We're also interested in using their BGP feeds, but their website (
> spamhaustech.com) doesn't give much confidence about their technical
> prowess. Trying to get a simple quote for BGP feeds is...interesting.
>=20
> -richard
>=20
>=20
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:25 AM, ISP Services <nanog@isp-services.nl> =
wrote:
>=20
>> Hi,
>>=20
>> I am wondering if anyone here has experiences with the Spamhaus DROP,
>> EDROP and BGPCC BGP feeds, for null routing hijacked prefixes, and =
prefixes
>> which contain (only) mallicious users.
>>=20
>> http://www.spamhaus.org/bgpf/
>>=20
>> We currently already use a Team Cymru feed for null routing bogons. =
Would
>> you reckon that the Spamhaus lists offer many valid additions to the =
Team
>> Cymru feeds? Did you have any disputes about prefixes that are =
announced as
>> malicious use by Spamhaus with customers or other ISP's?
>>=20
>> Any responses, on or off list are appreciated.
>>=20
>> Thanks,
>>=20
>> Dennis Hagens
>> Network Engineer
>> AS 24875
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
