[168121] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Experiences with Spamhaus BGP DROP, EDROP and BGPCC BGP feeds
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard Hesse)
Thu Jan 9 17:10:29 2014
In-Reply-To: <52CE6B0B.5050306@isp-services.nl>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 22:10:08 +0000
From: Richard Hesse <richard.hesse@weebly.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
We're also interested in using their BGP feeds, but their website (
spamhaustech.com) doesn't give much confidence about their technical
prowess. Trying to get a simple quote for BGP feeds is...interesting.
-richard
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:25 AM, ISP Services <nanog@isp-services.nl> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering if anyone here has experiences with the Spamhaus DROP,
> EDROP and BGPCC BGP feeds, for null routing hijacked prefixes, and prefixes
> which contain (only) mallicious users.
>
> http://www.spamhaus.org/bgpf/
>
> We currently already use a Team Cymru feed for null routing bogons. Would
> you reckon that the Spamhaus lists offer many valid additions to the Team
> Cymru feeds? Did you have any disputes about prefixes that are announced as
> malicious use by Spamhaus with customers or other ISP's?
>
> Any responses, on or off list are appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dennis Hagens
> Network Engineer
> AS 24875
>
>
>
>
