[168084] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: EIGRP support !Cisco
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Wed Jan 8 13:05:33 2014
X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 18:03:41 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: nick@flhsi.com, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <7e6435ef$3155a908$2d31daf4$@flhsi.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 08/01/2014 17:52, Nick Olsen wrote:
> Completely agree. But this is needed to integrate into an existing network.
> OSPF would've been my first choice.
you'll need to pay cisco tax then. Cisco opened up most of eigrp to the
ietf as an informational rfc, but didn't release anything related to eigrp
stub areas. This means that the ietf release is not that useful if a
vendor wanted feature parity with cisco's implementation. So far I'm not
aware of any vendors who have implemented it. Maybe some will do so in future.
Nick
