[168088] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: EIGRP support !Cisco
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ray Soucy)
Wed Jan 8 13:26:02 2014
In-Reply-To: <314081fe$4b51d1c$875b4a5$@flhsi.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 13:25:51 -0500
From: Ray Soucy <rps@maine.edu>
To: nick@flhsi.com
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Use a standard protocol and redistribute between the two. OSPF is likely
the easiest way to go for this.
I like EIGRP, but I don't think I like it enough to try a non-Cisco
implementation of it. At least with OSPF you know that most of the bugs
have been worked out (hopefully).
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Nick Olsen <nick@flhsi.com> wrote:
> Looking for EIGRP support in a platform other than Cisco. Since it was
> opened up last year. We have a situation where we need to integrate into a
> network running EIGRP and would like to avoid cisco if at all possible.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Nick Olsen
> Network Operations
> (855) FLSPEED x106
>
>
>
--
Ray Patrick Soucy
Network Engineer
University of Maine System
T: 207-561-3526
F: 207-561-3531
MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network
www.maineren.net
