[167412] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BRAS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan White)
Wed Dec 11 10:21:04 2013
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:15:31 -0600
From: Dan White <dwhite@olp.net>
To: Clayton Zekelman <clayton@MNSi.Net>
In-Reply-To: <1386774632_331846@duplo.mnsi.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 12/11/13 10:10 -0500, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
>
>
>
>At 09:30 AM 11/12/2013, Dan White wrote:
>>On 12/10/13 19:51 +0530, Nilesh Kahar wrote:
>>>Which is a good BRAS product, to handle 15000 subscribers sessions with
>>>full QoS & other features?
>>
>>Juniper MX (480).
>
>I heard there were some issues with the LAC/LNS functionality on the
>MX series vs. JUNOSe on the E series. Is that still the case?
I have not used those features with the platform, so I can't confirm. The
box has been very solid for us as a subscriber management platform for
q-in-q termination.
--
Dan White
