[167411] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BRAS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gabriel Blanchard)
Wed Dec 11 10:17:27 2013
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:12:51 -0500
From: Gabriel Blanchard <gabe@teksavvy.ca>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <1386774632_331846@duplo.mnsi.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 13-12-11 10:10 AM, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
>
>
>
> At 09:30 AM 11/12/2013, Dan White wrote:
>> On 12/10/13 19:51 +0530, Nilesh Kahar wrote:
>>> Which is a good BRAS product, to handle 15000 subscribers sessions with
>>> full QoS & other features?
>>
>> Juniper MX (480).
>>
>> --
>> Dan White
>
>
> I heard there were some issues with the LAC/LNS functionality on the
> MX series vs. JUNOSe on the E series. Is that still the case?
Well I'm being told by my Juniper sales reps to stay away from LAC/LNS
on the MX for now...so I have. Still rocking E320s
-Gabe
