[166898] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Question on routing of Tata AS6453 with their other network AS4755
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Mon Nov 18 13:17:29 2013
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ0+aXZFxWza0TaZKom2F8WVVb4JsgjHPm-Co4GkDAm3sBq+gA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:17:07 -0500
To: Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>, Michael Smith <mksmith@mac.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Nov 18, 2013, at 3:01 AM, Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com> wrote:
> Heu Michael
>=20
>=20
> But this time AS4755 wasn't their customer. It's their own network in
> India!
>=20
>=20
> I think probably it will be hard for us and in general for technical
> community to comment on business side of it but I am just curious on
> technical side on what it is like that? Is it missing iBGP sessions or =
just
> intentional filtering of a group of prefixes via a peer group or based =
on
> some community tag?
It's hard to tell what the right answer is without the prefix and =
diagnosing the problem from multiple locations. Collecting data from =
various looking glasses in multiple cities and regions is always helpful =
to triangulate what is going on.
- Jared=
