[166896] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Question on routing of Tata AS6453 with their other network AS4755
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anurag Bhatia)
Mon Nov 18 03:03:13 2013
In-Reply-To: <1AC8302C-304F-48BE-BB39-5F2309409954@mac.com>
From: Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:31:46 +0530
To: Michael Smith <mksmith@mac.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Heu Michael
But this time AS4755 wasn't their customer. It's their own network in
India!
I think probably it will be hard for us and in general for technical
community to comment on business side of it but I am just curious on
technical side on what it is like that? Is it missing iBGP sessions or just
intentional filtering of a group of prefixes via a peer group or based on
some community tag?
Thanks.
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Michael Smith <mksmith@mac.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 16, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone
> >
> >
> > I was looking around and noticed a pretty bad route from DTAG to Tata
> > AS6453 (basically destination was Tata Comm's Indian network on AS4755).
> I
> > am not able to understand cause for inefficient routing but I am sure I
> am
> > failing to understand something which is crazy in their IGP. The result
> is
> > that route from Europe to India is via Europe > US > Singapore > India
> > rather then direct India.
> >
> <snip>
>
> I think you'll find that these decisions are intentional and driven by the
> cost of routes headed direct over land from EU to India. Ask Tata for a
> price quote for transit internet services in the EU and, separately, for
> transit internet in the EU that go direct from EU to India. They are not
> the same price.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike
--
Anurag Bhatia
anuragbhatia.com
Linkedin <http://in.linkedin.com/in/anuragbhatia21> |
Twitter<https://twitter.com/anurag_bhatia>
Skype: anuragbhatia.com
