[166697] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: How anti-NSA backlash could fracture the Internet along national
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Tykwinski)
Mon Nov 4 09:30:54 2013
From: "Eric Tykwinski" <eric-list@truenet.com>
To: "nanog " <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <A73F23C3-243D-4A65-AF3D-5BC5F652024D@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:30:15 -0500
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Just wanted to add something to the discussion:
http://www.renesys.com/2013/10/google-dns-departs-brazil-ahead-new-law/
Basically, they are claiming possible new laws in Brazil have left Google to
shut down DNS services locally.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jorge Amodio [mailto:jmamodio@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 8:37 AM
To: Masataka Ohta
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: How anti-NSA backlash could fracture the Internet along
national borders - The Washington Post
That is correct (not everywhere) but it has no direct relationship with the
economics plus violating local or international laws is way above layer 7
Also there is no uniform and universal standard that defines what is or is
not a violation.
-Jorge
> On Nov 4, 2013, at 7:17 AM, Masataka Ohta
<mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
>
> Jorge Amodio wrote:
>
>> There is no field on the IP packet header to indicate to which
>> political mandate the packet belongs.
>
> If a service provider violates some local regulation, the provider
> will be punished, which is the political mandate.
>
> That is, the service provider should better observe related local
> regulations as long as they want to have business at the locale.
>
> Masataka Ohta
