[166696] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How anti-NSA backlash could fracture the Internet along national
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jorge Amodio)
Mon Nov 4 08:36:48 2013
In-Reply-To: <52779E60.9070805@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
From: Jorge Amodio <jmamodio@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 07:36:36 -0600
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
That is correct (not everywhere) but it has no direct relationship with the e=
conomics plus violating local or international laws is way above layer 7
Also there is no uniform and universal standard that defines what is or is n=
ot a violation.
-Jorge
> On Nov 4, 2013, at 7:17 AM, Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.j=
p> wrote:
>=20
> Jorge Amodio wrote:
>=20
>> There is no field on the IP packet header to indicate to which
>> political mandate the packet belongs.
>=20
> If a service provider violates some local regulation, the
> provider will be punished, which is the political
> mandate.
>=20
> That is, the service provider should better observe related
> local regulations as long as they want to have business
> at the locale.
>=20
> Masataka Ohta
