[166256] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: comcast ipv6 PTR
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?=)
Tue Oct 15 11:21:46 2013
From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= <bjorn@mork.no>
To: Brielle Bruns <bruns@2mbit.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:18:11 +0200
In-Reply-To: <FE277981-F6A6-4589-AEF7-8454CC34A5E1@2mbit.com> (Brielle Bruns's
message of "Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:06:06 -0600")
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Brielle Bruns <bruns@2mbit.com> writes:
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 15, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Bj=C3=B8rn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> wrote:
>
>> Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> writes:
>>> On 10/14/2013 07:47 PM, John Levine wrote:
>>>> Doing rDNS on random hosts in IPv6 would be very hard.
>>>=20
>>> * PTR generic.reverse.record.isp.net.
>>>=20
>>> can we move on now?
>>=20
>> Sure. If you can explain how that is going to resolve forward.
>
> Wildcard A records like have been done forever (even if not exactly recom=
mended)?
Maybe. Personally I put a lot more trust into an IPv6 address with no
PTR than an IPv6 address with a PTR not resolving back to the same
address.
Bj=C3=B8rn
