[166255] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: comcast ipv6 PTR
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Sullivan)
Tue Oct 15 11:19:39 2013
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:14:09 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <asullivan@dyn.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAA5Ek4eQy8VE-mM9ZKUZghr5Rc9F1Jaw01RE4Lr0d=x5FPt9LQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 09:58:22PM -0500, Blair Trosper wrote:
> Leaving out v6 PTR on your core/backbone/edge routers? Surely that's not
> acceptable...
As I think I said somewhere up-thread, there's really no consensus on
what is "acceptable" in reverse mapping. The last time we tried to
get consensus, we couldn't even get it on the blandest draft possible.
Best,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
Dyn, Inc.
asullivan@dyn.com
v: +1 603 663 0448
