[165970] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP Attribute 128
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Saku Ytti)
Fri Sep 27 02:39:54 2013
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:39:15 +0300
From: Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <5009F30A-BB9F-44FB-A21A-23AA5E93CCB7@puck.nether.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On (2013-09-26 17:02 -0500), Jared Mauch wrote:
> I certainly agree. There is a very narrow case for filtering 128 as it's a VPN attribute that should not be in the big-I Internet.
I can't think of application right now, but I'm not convinced there isn't
application for 128 over INET.
I know RFC strictly speaks about VPN deployment, but I wouldn't be too
surprised if someone would have good use-case for tunneling attributes over
INET.
--
++ytti
