[165964] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP Attribute 128
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Saku Ytti)
Thu Sep 26 17:29:07 2013
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:28:51 +0300
From: Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <9F01FD08-ECF7-4660-ADB9-6EB899F90198@puck.nether.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On (2013-09-25 11:35 -0400), Jared Mauch wrote:
Hi,
> I'm not really in favor of the features vendors have provided, such as this to just drop the attribute or routes.
I would encourage customers to require in their transit agreements that bgp
updates are not mangled by provider. It would help internally if you have
customer backing.
I think it's overraction to kill useful features because sometime on some
platform there has been NLRI parsing bug which caused issues.
Once those filters are deployed there will be strong resistance to remove
them.
--
++ytti
