[165895] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Tue Sep 24 23:25:24 2013
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 05:25:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: "Nathanael C. Cariaga" <nccariaga@stluke.com.ph>
In-Reply-To: <5242543C.8020709@stluke.com.ph>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Nathanael C. Cariaga wrote:
> doing multi-homing and having a /48 in each site would be very big waste
> of IP resources.
IPv6 was designed with an expectation of having /48 per geographical site
and this is perfectly fine.
I have a /48 at home.
What is more of a concern is to do aggregation in the DFZ, if every size
got itself a /48 PI and announced it in the DFZ then the routing system
would not be very happy...
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
