[165902] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Wed Sep 25 09:53:13 2013
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <5242543C.8020709@stluke.com.ph>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 06:45:02 -0700
To: "Nathanael C. Cariaga" <nccariaga@stluke.com.ph>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Each site should get at least a /48.
Stop worrying about dense-packing the IP space in IPv6. This is =
IPv4-think. IPv6 is intended to be sparsely allocated.
Owen
On Sep 24, 2013, at 8:10 PM, Nathanael C. Cariaga =
<nccariaga@stluke.com.ph> wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> I raised actually this concern during our IP resource application.
>=20
> On a personal note, I think /48 IPv6 allocation is more than enough =
for our organization to use for at least the next 5-10 years assuming =
that this can be farmed out to our multiple sites. What makes this =
complicated for us is that we are operating on a multiple sites =
(geographically) with each site is doing multi-homing and having a /48 =
in each site would be very big waste of IP resources.
>=20
> -nathan
>=20
> On 9/25/2013 2:36 AM, Bryan Socha wrote:
>> Everyone is following the same policies. a /48 PER SITE. did you
>> request enough addresses from your RIR?
>>=20
>> Bryan Socha
>>=20
>=20
