[165893] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathanael C. Cariaga)
Tue Sep 24 23:05:53 2013
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:10:52 +0800
From: "Nathanael C. Cariaga" <nccariaga@stluke.com.ph>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAAYzVeH-Vf9nie5Qtj9gEbFA6UH3C+Mez8aF12kmLmgsMKU10w@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi,
I raised actually this concern during our IP resource application.
On a personal note, I think /48 IPv6 allocation is more than enough for
our organization to use for at least the next 5-10 years assuming that
this can be farmed out to our multiple sites. What makes this
complicated for us is that we are operating on a multiple sites
(geographically) with each site is doing multi-homing and having a /48
in each site would be very big waste of IP resources.
-nathan
On 9/25/2013 2:36 AM, Bryan Socha wrote:
> Everyone is following the same policies. a /48 PER SITE. did you
> request enough addresses from your RIR?
>
> Bryan Socha
>
