[165886] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steve Bertrand)
Tue Sep 24 14:47:22 2013
From: Steve Bertrand <steve.bertrand@amayagaming.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:46:56 +0000
In-Reply-To: <BD888C3C-9F36-42BA-A47A-1973AA07785A@delong.com>
Cc: NANOG Mailing List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen@delong.com]
> Sent: September-24-13 12:19
> To: Randy Bush
> Cc: NANOG Mailing List
> Subject: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size
>=20
>=20
> On Sep 24, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>=20
> >> I am running a network that is operating on multiple sites and
> >> currently rolling out our IPv6 on the perimeter level. Having
> to get
> >> our /48 allocation from our RIR
> >
> > excuse, but which rir handed out a /48 under which policy?
> >
> > randy
>=20
> ARIN will give out /48s to end users.
>=20
> AfriNIC will give out /48s to end users.
>=20
> I believe (but haven't verified) that this is also possible from
> APNIC and LACNIC.
APNIC:
7.2.1. Initial Assignments
"APNIC will allocate a minimum of a /48 to organizations that can demonstra=
te..."
LACNIC:
4.5.4. Direct Assignments to End Sites
In a couple of subsections: "Assignments will be made in blocks smaller tha=
n or equal to a /32 but always greater than or equal to a /48."
Steve
