|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 22:19:22 -0600 From: Clinton Popovich <pcprognosis@verizon.net> To: nanog@nanog.org In-reply-to: <CACnPsNWFonG=2gRG9K=Oh5F+uUH_b2UTCMQpPmtM2XJEVsVJRQ@mail.gmail.com> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org so true On 8/14/2013 10:10 PM, Scott Howard wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote: > >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net> >>> All that said: My back-of-the-envelope math says the Internet is order >>> of 1 exabyte/day, as defined by my own rules on what counts as "the >>> Internet"[*]. I could easily be wrong, but you asked. >> Which means that you could get somewhere between 11 and 17 days (depending >> on how far off my math was) worth of all of that onto LTO-5 carts and load >> them on a 747F. Where you'd fly them to, I'm not sure. > > Unless you add in de-dup, in which case it probably comes down to about 10 > carts per day. After all, we all know that 90% of that 1 exabyte/day is > just the same 3 cat videos on Youtube... > > Scott >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |