[164499] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: One of our own in the Guardian.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Hamelin)
Sun Jul 14 00:48:24 2013
In-Reply-To: <CAPiURgXoZYRXDJT_3=WRP_3+5UteCocm1tqVGL8WZ+V1Mf5Arw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joe Hamelin <joe@nethead.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 21:44:18 -0700
To: Grant Ridder <shortdudey123@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
http://www.nwi.net/ I'm thinking. Rides the county's fiber network. I
remember delivering them T1s from Seattle back in the day ('96ish). I sure
wish I could get some of that love.
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Grant Ridder <shortdudey123@gmail.com>wrote:
> Someone I know in Washington state has 100/100 at home and made the
> comment to me a year ago that it was one of the slower speeds offered. I
> am not sure who his ISP is however.
>
> -Grant
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Joe Hamelin <joe@nethead.com> wrote:
>
>> Jima said: Really, who has 100/100 at home?
>>
>> Oddly, those living in Grand Coulee, WA.
>>
>> I went there once to setup corporate connectivity for a regional tire
>> store. They ordered the minimal drop, 50/50Mbs. One of the tire changers
>> there told me that he had 100/100 at home for $50/month.
>>
>> This was a town without T-Mobile service. I had to haul out the butt set
>> and clip on to the business POTS lines to turn up the VPN.
>>
>> Most of rural Central Washington has very good fiber connectivity. Forward
>> looking Public Utility Districts FTW!
>>
>> --
>> Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
>>
>
>
