[164497] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: One of our own in the Guardian.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Grant Ridder)
Sun Jul 14 00:32:55 2013
In-Reply-To: <CAO0-hXZtexcxL1tSHuM=pDHmZd+3LFkQKaUWPYBuNXNzb37fvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 21:32:33 -0700
From: Grant Ridder <shortdudey123@gmail.com>
To: Joe Hamelin <joe@nethead.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Someone I know in Washington state has 100/100 at home and made the comment
to me a year ago that it was one of the slower speeds offered. I am not
sure who his ISP is however.
-Grant
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Joe Hamelin <joe@nethead.com> wrote:
> Jima said: Really, who has 100/100 at home?
>
> Oddly, those living in Grand Coulee, WA.
>
> I went there once to setup corporate connectivity for a regional tire
> store. They ordered the minimal drop, 50/50Mbs. One of the tire changers
> there told me that he had 100/100 at home for $50/month.
>
> This was a town without T-Mobile service. I had to haul out the butt set
> and clip on to the business POTS lines to turn up the VPN.
>
> Most of rural Central Washington has very good fiber connectivity. Forward
> looking Public Utility Districts FTW!
>
> --
> Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
>
