[163879] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Thu Jun 20 16:10:26 2013
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 05:09:57 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: David Siegel <David.Siegel@Level3.com>
In-Reply-To: <970945E55BFD8C4EA4CAD74B647A9DC04868C5B7@USIDCWVEMBX10.corp.global.level3.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> The tools cannot estimate burden into the peers network very well,
> particularly when longest-exit routing is implement to balance the
> mileage burden, so each party shares their information with each other
> and compares data in order to make decisions.
>
> It's not common, but there are a handful of peers that share this
> information with each other.
i have not been able to find it easily, but some years back rexford and
others published on a crypto method for peers to negotiate traffic
adjustment between multiple peering points with minimal disclosure. it
was a cool paper.
randy
