[163826] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Blake Dunlap)
Wed Jun 19 19:12:50 2013
In-Reply-To: <m27ghpya80.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Blake Dunlap <ikiris@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:12:10 -0500
Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Or alternately:
Verizon wishes money to accept data it requested from other vendors, film
at 11.
It's all in the application of the angular momentum...
-Blake
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> > Even better by Verizon -
> >
> http://publicpolicy.verizon.com/blog/entry/unbalanced-peering-and-the-real-story-behind-the-verizon-cogent-dispute
> >
> > Some may recognize the name of the author for the WSJ article given
> > she attended NANOG in Orlando -
> >
> http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424127887323836504578553170167992666-lMyQjAxMTAzMDEwOTExNDkyWj.html
> >>
> >>
> http://gigaom.com/2013/06/19/peering-pressure-the-secret-battle-to-control-the-future-of-the-internet/
>
> as someone who does not really buy the balanced traffic story, some are
> eyeballs and some are eye candy and that's just life, seems like a lot
> of words to justify various attempts at control, higgenbottom's point.
>
> randy
>
>
