|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 18:25:15 +0100 From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> To: Job Snijders <job.snijders@atrato.com> In-Reply-To: <4AE99398-F324-4255-9248-570D92222DF7@atrato.com> Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On 13/06/2013 17:48, Job Snijders wrote: > Good news everyone, 99% of the parsable data in PeeringDB is valid! :-) you mean: 99% of the parsable data in PeeringDB which is maintained by people conscientious enough to provide the output of "show bgp sum" from their routers, is valid. Good talk, and interesting research, but I have a feeling that there might be some unintentional researcher bias creeping in there. :-) Nick
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |