[162736] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Andros Island Connectivity?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Warren Bailey)
Tue Apr 30 21:34:17 2013

From: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
To: Ryan Wilkins <ryan@deadfrog.net>, Rob Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 01:33:50 +0000
In-Reply-To: <E409AC0C-F07C-483D-90AD-41BBEC96E642@deadfrog.net>
Cc: "Aaron C. de Bruyn" <aaron@heyaaron.com>,
 NANOG mailing list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

http://www.xiplink.com is who we work with (and sell). Don't mean to
advertise on NANOG, more of an FYI and place for those who care to learn
something. I hate the fact that satellite is looked at like a white
unicorn, it's a pretty cool solution that will perform day in and out for
as long as you need it to.

On 4/30/13 6:29 PM, "Ryan Wilkins" <ryan@deadfrog.net> wrote:

>I was going to mention this but failed to do so.
>
>At the very least, do some testing first to make sure that the latency
>isn't going to introduce unforeseen issues.  Case in point, the Chicago
>satellite-based network that I manage is sometimes used for Police / Fire
>/ EMS dispatching.  The City's Computer Aided Dispatch system ended up
>crashing during an early test when it was discovered that it couldn't
>handle the high latencies encountered on satellite links.  This required
>the vendor to adjust the code to deal with these issues.  Granted this is
>an extreme example, but the point is that the physics of satellite links
>can do all sorts of things to applications that one might not expect.
>
>Cheers,
>Ryan Wilkins
>
>On Apr 30, 2013, at 9:13 PM, Rob Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com> wrote:
>>=20
>> They will not be happy with VSAT latency (typically 700ms though
>> physics says you can never do better than 550, and that's for the
>> space segment alone) if they are running RDP, VNC, Citrix, or similar
>> technologies.  Sorry for being a buzzkill, Warren.  :)
>
>
>




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post