[162702] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Tier1 blackholing policy?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (joel jaeggli)
Tue Apr 30 12:00:36 2013
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:00:08 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Thomas Schmid <schmid@dfn.de>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <517FE206.5070306@dfn.de>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 4/30/13 8:23 AM, Thomas Schmid wrote:
> On 30.04.2013 17:07, Chris Boyd wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:59 -0400, ML wrote:
>>> 1) Do nothing - They're supposed deliver any and all bits
>>> (Disregarding
>>> a DoS or similiar situation which impedes said network)
>>> 2) Prefix filter - Don't be a party (at least in one direction) to the
>>> bad actors traffic.
>>
>> 3 - Deliver all packets unless I've signed up for an enhanced security
>> offering?
>>
>
> right - I see this really as something that should be decided at the edge
> of the internet (Tier2+) and not in the core.
You seem to have odd ideas about what it means to be a settlement free
provider. Most of their customers are not smaller internet service
providers.
>
>
