[162525] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: "It's the end of the world as we know it" -- REM
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Grundemann)
Wed Apr 24 08:14:27 2013
In-Reply-To: <5177CB0C.7050905@fud.no>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:14:13 -0400
From: Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann@gmail.com>
To: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> wrote:
> * Chris Grundemann
>
>> Nope, you are correct Geoff. There is a /10 reserved for transition
>> technologies (e.g. outside addresses on a CGN) and there is a
>> "critical infrastructure" reserve, but no general purpose reserve like
>> in RIPE and APNIC.
>
> One interesting thing is that this is dedicated specifically for
> transition/deployment of *IPv6*. So the way I understand it, you won't
> get any space from this block to number the outside of a NAT444-style
> CGN, while you would for a NAT64-style CGN.
>
> https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four10
That's a very good clarification, thanks Tore.
> Tore
--
@ChrisGrundemann
http://chrisgrundemann.com
