[162524] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: "It's the end of the world as we know it" -- REM
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tore Anderson)
Wed Apr 24 08:08:06 2013
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:07:40 +0200
From: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
To: Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC1-dtnog=v6zTAcjnn4p6nsSLmzgxRyzbFUwmnpZeffPCix-g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
* Chris Grundemann
> Nope, you are correct Geoff. There is a /10 reserved for transition
> technologies (e.g. outside addresses on a CGN) and there is a
> "critical infrastructure" reserve, but no general purpose reserve like
> in RIPE and APNIC.
One interesting thing is that this is dedicated specifically for
transition/deployment of *IPv6*. So the way I understand it, you won't
get any space from this block to number the outside of a NAT444-style
CGN, while you would for a NAT64-style CGN.
https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four10
Tore
