[162296] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chuck Anderson)
Mon Apr 8 15:18:25 2013
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:18:10 -0400
From: Chuck Anderson <cra@WPI.EDU>
To: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>
Mail-Followup-To: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>,
Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>,
nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <B14A62A57AB87D45BB6DD7D9D2B78F0B1160CD2F@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I think he means patent encumbered.
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 07:13:11PM +0000, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote:
> Chris,
>
> UmmmŠ you mean the IPv6 and IPv4 inter-dependency when you say IP
> encumbered?
>
> If so, the answer is Yes. v6 addressing doesn't need to change to
> accommodate this IPv4 A+P encoding.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Rajiv
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
> Date: Monday, April 8, 2013 2:28 PM
> To: Rajiv Asati <rajiva@cisco.com>
> Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
>
> >
> >On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
> ><rajiva@cisco.com> wrote:
> >
> >Yes, MAP (T-Translation or E-Encap mode) is implemented on two regular
> >routers that I know of - ASR9K and ASR1K. Without that, you are right that
> >MAP wouldn't have been as beneficial as claimed.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >glad it's cross platform... is it also IP encumbered so it'll remain just
> >as 'cross platform' ?
